Friday, May 30, 2014

In case you


Home Grazing Mngmt. Planning Fencing Water Pasture Health Forage Weeds Soil Livestock Behavior Beef Cattle Dairy Cattle Sheep Goats Pigs Poultry Horses Money Ecosystem Services Marketing Leasing Pasture Transferring the Farm Consider molluscum contagiosum This The Scoop Shop Membership Goods & Services Browse Ads Search Ads Place Ad Contact Advertise With Us Reprint Policies Editorial molluscum contagiosum Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Staff Email Us
Yes, you can use equipment, herbicides and fertilizers to reduce your weeds and increase your grasses in pasture. But is it really cost-effective? Just a thought – maybe if your livestock ate nutritious weeds, everyone’s life would be easier.
Actually, I didn’t have to teach my trainees to eat ragweed. I taught them to eat diffuse knapweed, and from there they began taste testing everything else in their pastures, until they ate a little of everything molluscum contagiosum and a lot of the most nutritious stuff.
An article in the March 2012 issue of BEEF magazine describes the success that a rancher in Oklahoma molluscum contagiosum has had in using herbicide to improve his pastures. molluscum contagiosum Using a combination of fertilizer and herbicide treatments to combat ragweed, he describes how, with good rainfall, he harvested 4.12 bales/acre of 1,500 lb. large square bales in 2010, and then 2.18 bales/acre during drought in 2011. In those areas where he only applied herbicide in the drought year, he got 1.84 bales per acre. In 2010, the extra inputs were a wash because the cost of production was about equal to what he could have purchased hay for. The rancher didn’t run numbers for 2011, when drought increased hay costs, but felt that he was ahead because he didn’t have to purchase as much hay as he might have.
What really caught my eye was the rancher’s comments about the protein value of his hay. In 2010, the protein was 7%. But in the 2011 drought year, the areas where he used both fertilizer and herbicide produced 8.7% protein hay. Yet, in spite of the gains in protein values, molluscum contagiosum he still doesn’t have enough to meet the maintenance requirements of his animals: 10.5% CP for mature beef cows and first-calf heifers, 8.8% CP for pregnant and replacement beef heifers, and 10.5% CP for all types of beef cattle.
That got me thinking about the nutritional molluscum contagiosum value of ragweed, which is significantly higher than grass, and how changing our thinking about what we feed our livestock might change our management and production costs.
Virginia Cooperative Extension molluscum contagiosum has a publication called “The Nutritive Value of Common Weeds and their Relation to Livestock Nutrient molluscum contagiosum Requirements” (by A. Ozzie Abaye, Guillermo Scaglia, and Chris Teutsch). Their review of the literature shows that most common molluscum contagiosum pasture weeds have sufficient crude protein to meet livestock requirements. They found that common ragweed had greater invitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) than both alfalfa an oats. It’s average invitro digestible dry matter is 73%, it’s acid detergent fiber is 25%, and it’s crude protein is 25%.
Here’s one of the tables from this article comparing the nutritive value of several common molluscum contagiosum pasture weeds with Alfalfa. The two samples of ragweed and one of alfalfa are highlighted in yellow. I thought you’d enjoy the whole table though because you might have some of the other weeds listed.
In case you’ve forgotten, NDF (neutral detergent fiber) measures cell-wall material molluscum contagiosum and is used to predict how much livestock may eat of the plant. The higher the number, the more fibrous the plant is, meaning animals will eat less. ADF (acid detergent fiber) is a similar cell-wall measure and is used to estimate molluscum contagiosum digestibility. The higher the number the lower the plant’s molluscum contagiosum digestibility. Again, if it’s not easy to digest, an animal will eat less.
What does all this mean to a rancher? Well, if it were me, I’d be comparing the protein values and the digestibility of the weeds in my pasture to the grass in my pasture and how that relates to what my livestock molluscum contagiosum need to do their jobs of growing big and fat. From there I’d think about what was more cost-effective for my particular operation. Would I rather invest my time and my potential profits by buying equipment and spraying molluscum contagiosum weeds? Or would I rather spend 10 hours of my time and $2.50 each to teach my cattle to turn those plants into nutritious forages?
I don’t mean to say anything negative about this particular rancher’s management. molluscum contagiosum It’s clear from the article that he thinks hard about what he can do to improve his product and his margins. He just may never have thought of weeds as forage.
On of the things the rancher points molluscum contagiosum out is that “Weeds grow best in drought, more so than grass.” It’s looking like drought this summer in many parts of the country. Maybe it’s time to turn those weeds into forage.
Editors Note: Here’s more on

No comments:

Post a Comment